AG Talk 2003 v1.07 Copyright 2003 David Felt All rights reserved
FREQUENCY
INITIATED HEALING / Immune Boosting
By Dave Felt
SLIDE - Frequency Assisted Healing / Immune Boosting
Since
the 1930’s a technology has existed which users say helps to relieve them
of pain and perhaps disease. In experiments I’ve done over the last several
years with a similar technology – exposing the body to frequency energy using
modulated plasma lamps, I’ve observed results on volunteers who exposed
themselves to frequency energy, and I’ve run tests with cell cultures, observing
results with those cultures.
In
this talk we will hear a brief summary of one method of frequency exposure;
the modulated plasma lamp, using both commercial and home-built equipment.
In use, one simply has to be near the device while its running.
Do
these devices work, how do they work, and what is the mechanism by which either
disease organisms are damaged, or is the immune system boosted so that the
body can better protect itself?
First,
a look at two of the machines I’ve used:
This
is a system available as a kit from a Canadian firm which has been building
this equipment for several years. They have received an approval from Health
Canada, the Canadian version of the FDA, for the use of their system for pain
management.
In operation, a citizen’s band radio, operating at channel 14, one of the Federal Communications Commission’s assigned frequencies for Industrial, Scientific and Medical uses, is fed from a programmable audio generator. The radio feeds an amplifier, and that drives the plasma tube through an antenna tuner. This system costs about $3000, or can be built at home for under $2000. The programmable frequency generator and the plasma tube are always the expensive parts.
Next
we have a home-built machine which works on a slightly different manner than
the previous machine.
This
device uses the same programmable frequency generator, but that frequency
source is amplified internally, and then feeds a racing car ignition coil,
which then feeds the plasma tube. To build the EMEM device one would spend
between $400 and $2000, with the plasma lamp and the frequency generator being
the expensive items. The frequency generator could be replaced by using a
PC or laptop running various freeware or shareware software programs, although
the PC’s hardware has problems generating accurate frequencies, which some
find to be necessary for correct use.
In
tests, either type of machine seem to work. The earlier Rife/Bare system appears
to have greater range and penetrating power than does the EMEM, and the EMEM
is sometimes called the Poor Man’s Rife machine. In observing volunteers being
exposed to the tubes, I find that they often fall asleep more quickly when
a Rife/Bare device is being used – maybe from more harmonics or more power.
This
is the plasma tube used in the previous system - one can see the violet-colored
plasma, and for test purposes, this tube has a photosensor attached to it
for making measurements of the light pulses while the tube is running. I
have a more technical version of this talk showing the various waveforms,
magnetic, electrical and photon pulses present when these systems are running,
and even the radio energy spectrum when the system is in use.
HOW DO THESE DEVICES WORK ON CELLS?
There
are a number of theories on how these machines work, and they all focus on
some form of interaction between the frequencies being generated, and the
effects of those frequencies on diseased cells. Just as certain kinds of
music is pleasing to the ear, and other types of music may be very irritating,
it is not that much a stretch of the imagination to think that certain frequencies
may also be unpleasant to disease organisms.
For those who feel that the concept of audio frequencies modulating a tube
of gas having an effect on organisms is just too much to believe, the following
slide addresses the idea:
SLIDE
– PARAMECIUM BLOWING UP
This
slide is from a videotape from Dr. James Bare showing the pond water one-celled
paramecium rupturing when exposed to energy at around 2000 hertz from a plasma
lamp at about a meter distance. Who is to say that similar damage can’t happen
to the much smaller bacterial or virus organisms, or that they may be damaged
slightly, not grow as quickly, or no longer reproduce as quickly? Anything
that hinders the disease cells gives the body a better chance to defend itself.
Another
more recent theory, gaining support by the scientific community is that the
body’s immune system helps clean up normal body cells that are either aged
or damaged. When a cell starts to “leak” – which happens when the cells are
near the end of their normal life cycle, or apoptosis – the macrophages then
recognize the leaking cell, and come clean it up. Recent research indicates
that cells start transferring an enzyme from their interior to their outer
membrane when they are approaching their point of cell death. This is also
a possibility for what’s happening – maybe disease cells exposed to specific
frequencies are stressed, causing them to leak or to transfer enzymes, and
thus be recognized and attacked by the immune system. (Enzyme is a lipid,
phosphatidylserine, and a binding protein on macrophage cells.)
In
my cell culture work, I’ve exposed the safe strain of e.coli – the same critters
we all have inside us, to modulated plasma lamps running frequencies tailored
for e.coli – and what do we see happening?
Here
is a sample cuvette of e.coli culture being exposed to the plasma lamp at
a 1 meter distance.
Well,
this chart shows that whatever might be happening, it isn’t easily recognizable
on the growth curve of an e.coli culture. In this experiment, the cell cultures
were exposed to a set of “e.coli frequencies” then the culture density was
measured using a spectrophotometer, and the cultures then placed into an
incubator at body temperature (37 deg. C). Each half hour, the samples were
agitated and again measured. Two controls, not exposed to the plasma, were
also prepared, incubated and measured at the same times as the exposed samples.
E.coli multiply in about 20 minutes, and provide the typical growth curves
you see here.
This
slide is certainly not as good an indicator as I'd like. However ..
SLIDE
– GROWTH % OF E-COLI
When we look at another chart, and the cultures percentage of growth, the cells which were closer to the lamp have the least growth. Clearly something is happening here, although the actual mechanism isn’t clear.
Also,
days later, the samples closer to the plasma tube died off at a much faster
rate than either the controls or the more distant samples. What might be happening
to cause this?
This
slide shows the light spectrum from Argon, Helium and Neon gasses – those
most commonly used in plasma tubes by experimenters, and the number of emission
lines of energy they emit when ionized. These are three of the “Noble Gasses”
meaning that their outer electron shells are full, and the gasses don’t react
or break down easily. Notice that Helium has only 23 emission lines of energy
when ionized – and volunteers report that the Helium plasma lamp feels “harsh”
to them, possibly an indication that Helium is especially effective?. Argon
seems to be pretty neutral, and Neon, which has lots and lots of energy in
the infra-red spectrum, has a “warm” feeling. Often either Argon alone is
used, or Argon with a trace of Neon. Experimenters report results regardless
of whether Helium or Argon is used.
SLIDE
– ELECTROMAGETIC SPECTRUM
(slide not yet available, requesting permission)
Here’s the Electromagnetic spectrum. The little dot represents a period at the end of a printed sentence – and the bacteria three orders of magnitude smaller, and virus cells another magnitude and more smaller yet. Notice that at the virus level these critters are about the same size as some wavelengths of light.. Maybe this has something to do with all this.
When
a plasma lamp is exposed to energy, it doesn’t just “turn on”, but instead
follows a different mechanism. Consider that the plasma tube has a rather
high vacuum inside it, with a fairly small number of gas atoms. Pressures
around 10 torr are used – by comparison the atmosphere we’re breathing is
about 760 torr.
When a voltage is placed across a plasma lamp, some atoms will have a few outer electrons spin off into the vacuum, becoming ions. These ions jump up in their energy level, and if the energy level is just right, they’ll stay at that energized state, but most will fall back to their stable condition, and emit a photon of energy. This process goes off and on for several microseconds, until finally enough ions are excited and the plasma lamp begins conducting and we can see the glow. This spike of energy takes awhile, during which there is chaos in the electrical signals attempting to energize the gas – and these signals, up into the hundreds of megahertz and even gigahertz range, if not higher, may be measured.
It
is possible that some portion of this energy is somehow resonant with the
cellular structure of a virus or bacterial cell, and perhaps helps it leak,
or allows some of the gates of the cell to open slightly, exposing the cell
to the body’s immune system.
SLIDE
– CELL APOPTOSIS
One
possibility of why emissions from plasma lamps seem to help combat disease
is that the energy from the lamp’s pulses may cause disease organisms to “leak”,
thereby allowing the body’s immune system to more easily recognize the organisms
and sweep in to absorb them. There is no confirmation of this interaction,
but it is recognized in the scientific community that the immune system’s
macrophage cells recognize enzymes on the outer membrane of aged or damaged
body cells, and come in to clean up those cells. The mechanism of how the
enzymes get to the outer membrane from inside the cell is not understood.
Whether the emissions from plasma lamps cause the same interactions with disease
cells is not known, however experiments with cell cultures clearly indicate
that there is a subtle effect on cells.
IMMUNE SYSTEM BOOST ?
So,
is this a boost for the immune system? That’s unknown – I have observed many
times volunteers exposing themselves to plasma lamps running a set of “flu”
frequencies, and like clockwork, at certain frequencies, the volunteers either
get very sleepy or just nod off. The next morning, the flu is gone. We don't
see the results with e.coli cultures that we'd like to see, yet in the body,
the emissions from the plasma lamp seem to be especially effective.
ARE THESE DEVICES HARMFUL?
Not
that we know of. Experimenters over the past 7 years have not found any harmful
effects from being around plasma lamps, although effects have been noticed,
such as cataracts disappearing, that experimenters get fewer colds, and others
find that one or two hour exposures seem to bring overnight relief from the
flu. I know two women who are in remission from bed-ridden hepatitus-C infections,
after being exposed to a plasma lamp regularly for several months in Canada.
I also met a lady in 2002 who is in remission from multiple myeoma, a usually
fatal cancer of the bone marrow, after an exposure program from one such device
here in the states.
None
of these technologies are approved in the United States, due to the restrictions
placed on the medical community from the days of Dr. Morris Fishbein, who
ran the American Medical Association from 1924 to 1949, and who was totally
opposed to the field then known as “Electromedicine”. Fishbein, in support
of the general practitioner physician and the pharmaceutical industry, helped
get very strict medical laws established during that time, and it hasn’t gotten
much better. Some states, California being one, even had Professional and
Business Practice laws on the books until perhaps twenty years ago whereby
an MD could lose his or her license to practice medicine for even discussing
or recommending a vitamin for a patient. Doctors in the 1930’s through the
1960’s were threatened with the loss of their licenses when they used plasma
devices, regardless if they worked, and the stories those MDs and their families
tell of the use of the plasma lamp machines - and of the authorities' actions
in removing them, are both miraculous and difficult to believe.
Research
into these areas is very difficult to get funding for, since there is virtually
no previous work published which supports this technology, and that is one
of the first things a granting agency wants to see. (If research into your
area of interest hasn’t been published, chances of grant funding are very
slim. And, since virtually all respected journals are peer-reviewed, the odds
of getting published are also very slim.)
THANK
YOU
Dave Felt
Website
www.dfe.net
Website www.rifejournal.org
www.rifejournal.org/DF-AG-Talk2003.htm
Acknowledgements:
Dr. James Bare: www.rifetechnologies.com
Don Tunney: www.resonantlight.com
Dr.
Kenneth Todar: www.textbookofbacteriology.net
Thanks to Drs Kenneth Todar
and Timothy Paustian, University of Wisconsin-Madison for his online
descriptions of cell structures. See http://www.bact.wisc.edu/MicrotextBook/BacterialStructure/Introduction.html
http://www.bact.wisc.edu/microtextbook/index.html
http://www.textbookofbacteriology.net/
